Dulla Hembram @ Mantu Hembram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37212 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2025 Thana- CHIHARA District- Jamui ====================================================== Dulla Hembram @ Mantu Hembram S/o Bitku Hembram R/o Vilage - Satpokhra, P.S. - Chakai, Dist. - Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Chihra P.S. Case No.102 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2), 103(2) & 238(2) of the BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the daughter of the informant was living at the house of one Naresh Hembram. It is alleged that one Ravi Hembram took away her daughter. After sometime, the dead body of daughter of the informant was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that name of this petitioner has surfaced in this case during investigation in the confessional statement of co-accused Raju Murmu, Jyoti Hembram and Kishan Murmu. It

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37212 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 2/2 has been submitted that save and except the confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner. It has further been submitted that similarly situated co-accused Raju Murmu has been granted bail by learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 22939 of 2026. It has been submitted that from perusal of the FIR it is clear that main thrust of allegation is against Ravi Hembram. It has been submitted that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since 10.01.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned A.C.J.M.-II, Jamui in connection with Chihra P.S. Case No.102 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T