Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35186/2020bail granted

Raj Kishor Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-08Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35186 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2020 Thana- KEWATI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

RAJ KISHOR MANDAL SON OF BISWANATH MANDAL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DHANUKI, PANCHAYAT- CHHATWAN, P.S. - KEOTI, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA 2.

KIRAN DEVI WIFE OF RAJ KISHORE MANDAL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DHANUKI, PANCHAYAT- CHHATWAN, P.S. - KEOTI, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA 3.

RAM PRAKASH MANDAL SON OF CHHATRA MANDAL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DHANUKI, PANCHAYAT- CHHATWAN, P.S. - KEOTI, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinay Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajeev Nayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This application for regular bail arises out of Keoti P.S. Case No. 75 of 2020, disclosing offence punishable under Section 307 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code. The informant herself is the victim, who has alleged that in the wake of land dispute between her and the persons named in the FIR, the petitioners entered into her house. There is specific allegation against petitioner no. 1 of having poured acid on the person of the informant. Petitioner no. 2 is the wife of petitioner no. 1 and petitioner no. 3 is said to be a co-sharer.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35186 of 2020(4) dt.08-02-2021 2/2 Allegation against petitioners no. 2 and 3 is of setting the informant's house on fire. The petitioners are in custody since 12.07.2020.

I have perused the case diary, from which it transpires that the injury report corroborates the allegation of causing hurt by throwing acid.

In such circumstances, I am not inclined to allow petitioner no. 1 privilege of regular bail for the present. His application is accordingly rejected.

Considering the nature of allegation against petitioners no. 2 and 3 and the fact that they are in custody since 12.07.2020, their prayer for grant of regular bail is allowed. Let petitioners no. 2 and 3, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand), each with two sureties of the like amount, each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in Keoti P.S. Case No. 75 of 2020.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Rajesh/- U T