Vivek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13566 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -23 Year- 2016 Thana -PATLIPUTRA District- PATNA ====================================================== Vivek Kumar, son of Sri Hira Lal Gupta, Owner of Baby Bird Hatchery, Resident of Mohalla:- Jagriti Nagar, Ashiana Road, Khajpura, DistrictPatna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. A.Haque Sahara, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-04-2016 Heard.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a criminal prosecution registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have produced forged bill before the General Manager, District Industries Centre, Patna for the purposes of grant of subsidy, but it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that no amount of subsidy was paid to him. According to him, the petitioner has not been in any way financially benefited on the basis of the alleged forged bill produced by him. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State of Bihar though has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail, but has not been able to dispute the aforesaid submissions. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is said to be the first offender, this Court is inclined to accede to the prayer made on his behalf for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13566 of 2016 (2) dt.12-04-2016 In the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Divya Mita, learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Patna in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 23 of 2016, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(C) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every date, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.
Arvind/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) U T