Chhote Lal Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14937 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.
Chhote Lal Singh Son of Lakshuman Singh Resident of Village- Aungari, P.S.- Aungari, District- Nalanda. Retired Teacher of Nari Gyan Bharti Sanskrit High School Bharti, Bhobhi Nalanda.
2.
Geeta Rani Wife of Dilkhush Kumar Resident of Village- Karai Parsurai, P.S.- Karai Parsurai, District- Nalanda. Retired Teacher of Nari Gyan Bharti Sanskrit High School Bharti, Bhobhi Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Special Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna. 5.
The Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna. 6.
The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Patna. 7.
The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Patna. 8.
The District Education Officer, Nalanda.
9.
The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nalanda. 10.
The Secretary, Managing Committee, Nari Gyan Bharti Sanskrit High School Bharti, Bhobhi Nalanda.
11.
The Headmaster, of Nari Gyan Bharti Sanskrit High School Bharti, Bhobhi Nalanda.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Prabhakar Jha (Gp27) Mr. Satyam Shivam Sundaram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is fully covered by the judgment passed by this
Patna High Court CWJC No.14937 of 2021(4) dt.04-07-2024 2/2 Court in L.P.A. No.43 of 2016 and analogous cases. 3.
Considering the aforesaid facts, since the case of the petitioners stand on similar footing to that of the petitioners of L.P.A. No.43 of 2016, there is no requirement to keep pending the present writ application.
4.
Accordingly, petitioners are directed to file a detailed representation along with a copy of the order passed in L.P.A. No.43 of 2016, before the respondent no.8 within a period of four weeks and the respondent no.8 is well advised to consider the case of the petitioners and dispose of the representation of the petitioners after affording an opportunity of personal hearing or through their counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and in light of the order passed in L.P.A. No.43 of 2016 within eight weeks from the date of filing of such representation by the petitioners.
5.
It is made clear that respondent no.8 shall be personally held responsible for non-compliance of this order. 6.
With the aforesaid directions, this writ application stands disposed of.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U