← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48539/2021bail rejected

Rajdhani Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2021-11-23Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48539 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2021 Thana- MOHANIYA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== RAJDHANI SHARMA Son of Late Ramjanam Sharma R/o VillageDulahara, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 302/201 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, on 29.03.2021 this petitioner took away her son and on 01.04.2021 dead body of her son was found in a field.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that informant is not an eye witness of the occurrence and petitioner has been made accused in this case only on suspicion due to family dispute after lapse of three days when dead body of son of informant was found. In fact informant was residing at her matrimonial house for last one year and petitioner never visited there at any point of time. Petitioner is in custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48539 of 2021(2) dt.23-11-2021 2/2 07.04.2021 and investigation in this case is complete. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is husband of informant and there is specific allegation against him that he took away son of informant with him and thereafter dead body of son of informant was found in a field.

Considering the nature of accusation and gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T