Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36903/2014bail granted

Nabhneel Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2015-04-01Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36903 of 2014 (2) dt.01-04-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36903 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -52 Year- 2014 Thana -RAGHOPUR District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Nabhneel Kumar, son of Shyam Kishore Singh, r/o. vill. Hulash, P.S. Prakhand Raghopur, Dist.Supaul.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar,Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 01-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 406, 409, 420, 120B and 34 IPC registered in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 52 of 2014.

3. It is submitted that the amount in question as concerns the petitioner has already been deposited as evident from the letter dated 12.03.2014 written by the Bihar State Co-operative Bank Ltd., Patna, (Annexure-3) requesting for withdrawal of the FIR.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36903 of 2014 (2) dt.01-04-2015 named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Birpur at Supaul, in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 52 of 2014 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present as and when required during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran U T