Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39445/2023bail granted

Laxman @ Laxman Yadav @ Laxman Kumar @ Laxman Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-31Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39445 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2023 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== LAXMAN @ LAXMAN YADAV @ LAXMAN KUMAR @ LAXMAN KUMAR YADAV son of Naresh Kumar Yadav @ Naresh Yadav, R/o VillageKhariya Basti, Yadav Tola, Ward No-10, P.S.- Araria, Dist- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anamul Haque For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 31-07-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 09 of 2023, registered for offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation, on 04.01.2023 the informant was returning from his office and when he reached near Parmanandpur Ward No. 13, three accused persons on a motor cycle overtook and stopped him, and at the point of pistol, they snatched Rs. 16,000/- and a mobile phone from his possession. They also threatened to kill had he chased.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the entire allegation against the petitioner is false. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39445 of 2023(2) dt.31-07-2023 2/2 petitioner is said to be purchaser of the mobile set looted away from the informant. It is a fact that the mobile was not recovered from the possession of the petitioner, rather it was recovered from another accused.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances as well as clean antecedent and also considering the fact that the petitioner is not named in the FIR, the prayer for bail is allowed.

7. Let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 09 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T