Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48139 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2021 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
Sunil Kumar Son Of Jiten Rai @ Jitendra Rai Resident Of Village- Dyalpur, P.S.- Rajapakar (Baranti O.P.), District- Vaishali. 2.
Bipin Kumar Son Of Jiten Rai @ Jitendra Rai Resident Of VillageDayalpur, P.S.- Rajapakar (Baranti O.P.), District- Vaishali. 3.
Lalu Kumar @ Bikki Kumar Son Of Raj Kishore Rai Resident Of VillageDayalpur, P.S.- Rajapakar (Baranti O.P.), District- Viashali. 4.
Chanchal Kumar Son Of Chhotelal Rai Resident Of Village- Dayalpur, P.S.- Rajapakar (Baranti O.P.), District- Viashali. 5.
Pappu Kumar Rai Son Of Ram Udgar Rai @ Rudal Rai Resident Of VillageRandaha, P.S.- Rajapakar (Baranti O.P.), District-Vaishali 6.
Bablu Kumar @ Bablu Kumar Rai Son Of Ram Udgar Rai @ Rudal Rai Resident Of Village- Dayalpur, P.S.- Rajapakar (Baranti O.P.), DistrictViashali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 25-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 353, 504/506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48139 of 2021(2) dt.25-04-2022 2/3 50-60 persons including the petitioners came at the place of occurrence, surrounded the police party and attacked on the police force by way of pelting bricks and stone. It is further alleged in the FIR that due to said attack made by the accused persons, some police personnel got injured. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rajapakar (Baranti O.P.) P.S. Case No. 123
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48139 of 2021(2) dt.25-04-2022 3/3 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T