← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/2408/2019dismissed

Jatan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-02Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2408 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2015 Thana- BIND District- Nalanda ====================================================== JATAN YADAV Son of Deep Chandra Yadav Resident of Village- Jakhor, Police Station- Bind, District- Nalanda.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Manish Kumar Late Bhola Darhi R/o Village- Jakhor, P.S.- Bind, Dist.- Nalanda ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-03-2022 Heard the parties.

This is an appeal under section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter in short referred to as the 'SC/ST Act') against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 27.02.2019 passed by learned 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Biharsharif, Nalanda, in connection with Bind P.S. Case No.01 of 2015 registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 448, 323, 504, 302 IPC and section 3(2)(v), SC/ST Act.

Vide order dated 31.01.2022, a report was called for, regarding the stage of trial. In compliance thereof, a report sent by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2408 of 2019(7) dt.02-03-2022 2/2 Court (SC/ST) POA Act, Nalanda at Biharsharif, dated 31.01.2022, is kept at flag 'M', whereby it is submitted that the case is at argument stage and if the parties co-operate, the case is likely to be concluded within three months. Considering the submissions made in the report, I am not inclined to grant bail to the appellant named above. The prayer for bail is hereby rejected.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

However, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Parties are directed to co-operate in the trial.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T