Sushil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9545 of 2025 ====================================================== Sushil Kumar Singh Son of Late Shatrudhan Kumar Singh @ Shatrudhan Singh Resident of Village and P.O. and P.S.-Goh, District-Aurangabad, Prop. M/s Jai Durga Rice Mill.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.

3.

The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Consumer Ltd. through the Managing Director, Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Patna.

5.

The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Aurangabad.

6.

The District Certificate Officer, Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Mohan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Standing Counsel (13) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 27-06-2025 Having regard to the fact that the petitioner had already filed his objections before the Certificate Officer, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the Certificate Officer to pass necessary orders under Section 10 of the Act duly taking into consideration the objections filed by the petitioner.

2. It is needless to observe that before passing any order, the Certificate Officer shall give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The entire exercise should be

Patna High Court CWJC No.9545 of 2025(2) dt.27-06-2025 2/2 completed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Any order passed shall be communicated to the parties.

3. Till such time, the final order is passed, the authority is directed not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner. In case the petitioner does not cooperate for the disposal of the case , the authority is free to pass any order. (A. Abhishek Reddy , J) Anushka/- U