Shubham Kumar @ Mannu Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36909 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2026 Thana- Chhaudahi District- Begusarai ====================================================== Shubham Kumar @ Mannu Ray Son of Dilip Kumar Ray Resident of VillageBad Bakhadda, ward no. 07, P.S.- Chhaurahi, Dist.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Dr. Bipin Chandra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-06-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1), 74, 303(2) of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioner came to her house on 09.02.2026 at 7.30 P.M. and started abusing. On objection, Dilip assaulted her husband on head by rod but her husband managed to save himself, but then, suffered injury on eyes and face and other accused assaulted her and her son who came to save the victim i.e. husband of the informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36909 of 2026(2) dt.15-06-2026 2/3
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that Chhaurahi P. S. Case No. 22 of 2026 was instituted by the mother of the petitioner against the informant and her side as such the instant FIR is a counter blast. It is further submitted that though it is alleged that petitioner assaulted the husband of the informant by rod causing injury on nose but then from perusal of the order impugned, it would manifest that the same records the injury report and it is recorded that the injuries are grievous in nature on vital part i.e. eyes and face. It is thus submitted that specific allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the victim by an iron rod causing injury on nose but then there is no injury suffered by the victim on nose. It is reiterated and submitted that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the victim did not suffer any injury on nose, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36909 of 2026(2) dt.15-06-2026 3/3 below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Chhaurahi P. S. Case No.23 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T