Patna High CourtL.P.A/1208/2014dismissed

The Magadh University Through Registrar Magadh University And ORS v. Smt. Kumkum Rani And ORS

2017-04-20Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1208 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19027 of 2008 ===========================================================

1. The Magadh University through Registrar Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya

2. The Vice - Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya

3. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. Smt. Kumkum Rani W/o Shri Sooraj Dev Narain Srivastava R/o Kamta Singh Lane, East Boring Canal Road, P.S. Budha Colony, District - Patna At present Posted as Lecturer, Department of Hindi, J.N.L. College, Khagaul, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya

2. The Chancellor, Universities of Bihar, Magadh University, Bodh - Gaya, Gaya

3. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department ( Higher Education ), Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Director, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

5. The Chancellor, University of Bihar (Magadh University) .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr K.N.Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Satyam Shivam Sundaram For the Chancellor : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Giri For the State : Mr Kumar Manish, SC 5 For the Pvt. Respondent : Mr Rajesh Kumar Singh =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 20-04-2017 I.A. No.6403 of 2014 is for condonation of delay of two year and 260 days. For the reasons indicated in the said application, the delay is condoned. I.A. is allowed.

After having heard learned senior counsel representing the University as well as other respondents, including the private respondent, the Court fails to understand as to why arguments are

Patna High Court LPA No.1208 of 2014 dt.20-04-2017 2/2 being made now after the impugned order dated 14.10.2011 has been more or less complied in toto. Only certain aspects of payment is subsisting but majority part of the entitlement has already been released in favour of the private respondent. Let the matter rest at that now. Appeal is dismissed in the changed circumstances.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) sk AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 21.4.2017 Transmission Date NA