Prithvi Chandra Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35337 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2018 Thana- SHANKARPUR District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.
Prithvi Chandra Sah Son of Late Nand Keshwar Sah Resident of Village and P.O-Raibhir, Ward No.08, Police Station-Shankarpur, District-Madhepura. 2.
Sitaram Sah Son of Late Nand Keshwar Sah Resident of Village and P.ORaibhir, Ward No.08, Police Station-Shankarpur, District-Madhepura. 3.
Arun Sah @ Arun Kumar Sah Son of Late Nand Keshwar Sah Resident of Village and P.O-Raibhir, Ward No.08, Police Station-Shankarpur, DistrictMadhepura. 4.
Surya Narayan Sah Son of Shri Prithvi Chandra Sah Resident of Village and P.O-Raibhir, Ward No.08, Police Station-Shankarpur, District-Madhepura. 5.
Hira Lal Sah Son of Shri Prithvi Chandra Sah Resident of Village and P.ORaibhir, Ward No.08, Police Station-Shankarpur, District-Madhepura. 6.
Brahmdeo Sah Son of Shri Prithvi Chandra Sah Resident of Village and P.ORaibhir, Ward No.08, Police Station-Shankarpur, District-Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Bambholi Sah Son of Bindeshwari Sah Resident of Village and P.O.-Raibhir, Ward No.08, P.S.-Shankarpur, District-Madhepura. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the State :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-11-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners after repeated calls. However, Mr. Shailendra Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State is present.
2. It appears that the petitioners have no interest in proceeding with the present application. In such circumstances, the learned district Court concerned, may proceed with the trial in accordance with law.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35337 of 2019(3) dt.24-11-2025 2/2
3. Any interlocutory order passed impeding the procedure to be followed shall lose its force.
4. Accordingly, the present application stands dismissed.
(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U T