Vikash Kumar @ Vikash v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42302 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-819 Year-2022 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
VIKASH KUMAR @ VIKASH SON OF CHALITRA CHAUDHARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAMANPUR, PS- TANKUPPA, DISTRICTGAYA 2.
PRADEEP KUMAR SON OF PARVESH CHAUDHARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAILY PS- MAGADH MEDICAL DISTRICT GAYA 3.
MITRANJAN KUMAR @ MITRANJAN SON OF DINESH CHAUDHARY RESIDENT O VILLAGE- PATHARAURA PS- MAGADH MEDICAL, DISTRICT- GAYA 4.
NAVGARH KUMAR SON OF RAJESHWAR BIND RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GAMHARI PS- GOH, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD 5.
SUNIL KUMAR SON OF SIDHESHWAR CHAUDHARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GAMHARI, PS- GOH, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shaheen Begum , Addl. Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 10 of the Conduct of Examination Act (Bihar).
3. It is a case of cheating by personation to obtain Government job.
4. It is submitted that the petitioners are innocent and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42302 of 2023(3) dt.07-08-2023 2/2 have falsely been implicated in this case merely because admit card of these petitioners was recovered from the mobile of the co-accused Pankaj Kumar who was apprehended on the spot by the police. In fact these petitioners have no concern with the coaccused Pankaj Kumar and Rahul kumar. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of these petitioners and they have not committed any cheating. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
5. Learned counsel for the State oppose the bail petition.
6 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gaya in connection with Musffasil P.S. Case No . 819 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Kaushik/- U T