Shilpi Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39020 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2022 Thana- FESHAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== SHILPI KUMARI D/O ARJUN SINGH @ ARJUN YADAV Resident of Mohalla- Sahpur Road Yamuna Nagar, Near Yadav College, P.S.- Aurangabad (Town) District- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Vigilance Investigation Bureau, though Police Inspector cum Investigation Officer Vigilance Investigation Bureau Gaya Range, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Renu Kumari, A.P.P.

For the Vigilance :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Spl. P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned Spl. P.P. for the Vigilance. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleges that she secured appointment as Panchayat teacher based on forged mark-sheet for BETET. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the recent FIR was instituted based on an inquiry carried behind her back, it is next submitted that if an

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39020 of 2022(2) dt.06-12-2022 2/2 opportunity would have been given to the petitioner to explain her side of the case, perhaps the present FIR would not have been instituted. Learned counsel further submits that the services of the petitioner now stands terminated and has suffered.

Learned Spl. P.P. for the Vigilance opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that allegation is of securing appointment based on forged and fabricated marksheet of BETET. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Feshar P.S. Case No. 17 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T