Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1855 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5115 of 2024 ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son of Ramesh Yadav, resident of Village- Kabaila, Ward No. 08, P.S.- Sour Bazar, District- Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, ICDS Integrated Child Development Scheme, Bihar. 3.

The Divisional Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa. 4.

The Deputy Director, Welfare, Koshi Division, Saharsa. 5.

The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Saharsa. 6.

The District Program Officer, Saharsa.

7.

The Sub. Divisional Officer, Saharsa.

8.

The Child Development Project Officer, Sour Bazar, District- Saharsa. 9.

The Block Development Officer, Sour Bazar, District- Saharsa. 10.

The Panchayat Secretary, Panchayat Rampur, Block- Sour Bazar, DistrictSaharsa. 11.

Kumari Surbhi Priya, Wife of Lal Krishna Kumar, resident of VillageRampur, Ward No. 8, P.S.- Sour Bazar, District- Saharsa. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rashmi Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Additional Advocate General 9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 18-10-2024 The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 5115 of 2024, which has stood dismissed for non-prosecution, vide order dated 4.4.2024. 2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the aforesaid case could not be marked in the daily cause list on 4.4.2024, resulting in the counsel being unable to attend the case

Patna High Court MJC No.1855 of 2024(3) dt.18-10-2024 2/2 when the case was called out for hearing, leading to dismissal of the aforesaid petition for non-prosecution, hence, a sympathetic view be taken and the aforesaid petition be restored to its original file.

3.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also considering the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct for restoration of the aforesaid writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 5115 of 2024 to its original file.

4.

The present restoration petition stands allowed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U