Sri Ramesh Choudhary v. The South Bihar Power State Power Holding Company Through Its Managing Director And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12534 of 2017 =========================================================== Sri Ramesh Choudhary son of Ramji Choudhary, resident of Mohalla- Ranipur Rashulpur, Patna City, Police Station- Mehandiganj, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The South Bihar Power Holding Company through its Managing Director, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Shiwalaya Market, Ashok Rajpath, Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

3. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Patna City, Patna.

4. The Assistant Electrical Engineer (Revenue), Patna City, Padri Ki Haweli, Patna.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Mani Bhushan Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Sr. Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 04-01-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to reconnect the electric line of the petitioner after depositing 10% of the total amount and revise the bill of the petitioner and issue fresh bill to the petitioner; and to issue appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction or directions to the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition need not be pressed, if liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the C.G.R.F., Patna for redressal of his grievances.

3. Having regard to the nature of the prayer, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the

Patna High Court CWJC No.12534 of 2017 dt.04-01-2018 C.G.R.F., Patna with an appropriate petition within a period of two weeks from today. If any such petition is filed before the C.G.R.F., Patna within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of on its own merits in accordance with law.

4. It is made clear that in case such a petition is filed, the concerned authority would have regard to the present proceeding being pursued by the petitioner while considering any issue relating to condonation of delay, if applicable.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 08.01.2018 Transmission Date N.A.