← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4396/2015dismissed

Sajid Anjum @ Md. Sajid Anjum @ Md. Sajid @ Sajid v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-03-29Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.4396 of 2015 (2) dt.29-03-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4396 of 2015 ====================================================== Sajid Anjum @ Md. Sajid Anjum @ Md. Sajid @ Sajid s/o Late Md. Muslim , resident of village Mirjapur, P.S. Kadwa,Dist. Katihar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Co-operative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate cum Dist. Election Officer for the PACS, Katihar.

4. The Dist. Co operative Election officer cum deputy election officer for PACS, Katihar.

5. The Block Development Officer Kadwa cum Election Officer, Dhaprasia, PACS.

6. The Block Co-operative extension officer, Kadwa, Katihar.

7. Md. Fakhir Arshad @ Md. Fakir Arshad S/o late Haji Mohsin , resident of village Dhaprasia, P.S. Kadwa, District- Katihar. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratnakar Ambastha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jai Shankar Barnawal, GA-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 29-03-2016 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Counsel for the State is present.

Perused the records.

The petitioner is aggrieved by rejection of his nomination to contest the election of the post of Chairman, Dhaprasia Agriculture Credit Cooperative Society in the district of Katihar.

The issue of rejection of nomination constitutes an election dispute to be raised before the prescribed authority under

Patna High Court CWJC No.4396 of 2015 (2) dt.29-03-2016 the provisions present in the Bihar State Election Authority Act, 2008 and the provision of the Bihar Cooperative Societies Act, 1935 read with the rules framed thereunder. No cause for indulgence is made out in the writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is dismissed.

(Jyoti Saran, J) S.Sb/- U