Md. Hadish @ Md Hadish Ansari @ Hadish Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36595 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-745 Year-2018 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== MD. HADISH @ MD HADISH ANSARI @ HADISH ALAM son of LATE MD. KHALIL Resident of Village- Korhaili, Ward No. 03, P.S. - Forbesganj, District- Araria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. J.KSingh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 25-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.
2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 28.11.2018 has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No.745 of 2018, having earlier been rejected by order dated 04.12.2019 in Cr. Misc. No. 55844 of 2019 for the alleged offences under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and he is not named in the FIR which has been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36595 of 2020(2) dt.25-01-2021 2/2 instituted against unknown persons. It is submitted that while rejecting the petitioner's earlier application for bail, this Court had granted liberty to renew the prayer after six months. The petitioner has already suffered custody for more than two years since 28.11.2018.
4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.
5. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No.745 of 2018, if he is not otherwise required in any other case.
6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T