Ashok Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36189 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2020 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ashok Singh Son of Bindeshwari Singh Resident of Village - Lakshmipur, P.S. - Jaynagar, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ratanakar Jha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pancha Nand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 30-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 25.03.2020 in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 103 of 2020, corresponding to G.R. No. 536/2020 for the alleged offences under Sections 272, 273, 290 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 40.500 litres of Nepali Saufi wine and a bicycle. It is stated that the petitioner has no concern with the offending goods and the bicycle, which were not recovered from his conscious possession. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.

5. Be that as it may and having regard to the period of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36189 of 2020(2) dt.30-01-2021 2/2 custody already suffered since 25.03.2020, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cumSpecial Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 103 of 2020, corresponding to G.R. No. 536/2020, if he is not otherwise required in any other case.

6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T