Ram Babu Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36972 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-555 Year-2017 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== RAM BABU SAH Son of Ram Agya Sah Resident of Village- Chiutahi, P.S.- Turkaulia, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Rinki Devi Wife of Ram Babu Sah, Daughter of Bindeshwari Sah Presently residing at Village- Nawada, Fatuha, P.S.- Kotwa, District- East Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Complaint Case No. C-555 of 2017, disclosing offences under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner happens to be husband of the complainant and allegation against him is of subjecting the complainant to cruelty in connection with demand of dowry.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that all the allegations are false and concocted and he is still ready to keep the informant with full honour and dignity. Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the complainant. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that the complainant is also ready to live with the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36972 of 2019(3) dt.18-09-2019 2/2 petitioner, if she is kept with full honour and dignity as a wife. Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application is disposed of with direction to the petitioner and the complainant to appear before the concerned court below on 27.09.

2019 and if the petitioner files an affidavit that he is ready to keep the complainant with himself with full honour and dignity and if he is willing to take the complainant with himself from the court itself, the court below shall release the petitioner on provisional bail for a period of six months to his own satisfaction and in the meantime, the court below will watch the conduct of the parties by calling the complainant and petitioner in the third week of each month for a period of six months and after six months, if the court below is satisfied with the conduct of the parties and their matrimonial life, he will confirm the provisional bail of the petitioner otherwise, he is free to pass any order / orders as he deems fit and proper including cancellation of provisional bail of the petitioner.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T