Patna High CourtCWJC/18488/2009dismissed

Mithilesh Kumari Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-04-07Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18488 of 2009 ====================================================== Mithilesh Kumar Jha, wife of Kameshwar Jha, resident of Bose Park, M.G. Road, Bhagalpur-01, P.S. Kotwali, Town and District- Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Industries, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Industries Development Commissioner, Department of Industries, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Joint Secretary, Department of Industries, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. The Under Secretary, Department of Industries, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

5. The Director Handloom & Silk, Department of Industries, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

6. The Commissioner for deciding inter-se-seniority of the Industries Department through the Joint Director, Industries ( Technical) Department of Industries, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

7. The Principal , Bihar Silk & Textile Institute, Nathnagar, Bhagalpur

8. Dr. Vijay Kumar, son of name not known to the petitioner, Retd. Lecturer, Bihar Silk & Textile Institute, Nathnagar, Bhagalpur

9. Dr. Ganesh Chandra Saha, son of name not known to the petitioner, Lecturer, Bihar Silk & Textile Institute, Nathnagar, Bhagalpur

10. Subodh Kumar Vishwakarma, son of name not known to the petitioner, Lecturer, Bihar Silk & Textile Institute, Nathnagar, Bhagalpur .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Purusottam Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to AAG-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-04-2017 Sri Abhishek Anand, learned counsel, on instruction of Sri Purushottam Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned AC to Addl. Advocate General no.7,

Patna High Court CWJC No.18488 of 2009 (6) dt.07-04-2017 2/2 submits that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as the same has become infructuous.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U