← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41798/2024bail granted

Sanjit Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-03Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41798 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Sanjit Ram SON OF LATE RAMDEV RAM VILLAGE- SANSAR POKHAR WARD NO. 17, PS- KABAIYA, DIST- LAKHISARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 111.075 liters of liquor from the cow shed of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and cow shed is place outside the house and is accessible to villagers at large

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41798 of 2024(2) dt.03-07-2024 2/3 and it appears that someone inimical to the petitioner planted the liquor in the cow shed in order to falsely implicate the petitioner and his family members. It is further submitted that no prudent person would use his own premises for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated. It is also submitted that though it is alleged that the cow shed belongs to the petitioner but then is asserted and submitted that the cow shed does not belong to the petitioner which amply demonstrates that police in mechanical manner implicated.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 270 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41798 of 2024(2) dt.03-07-2024 3/3

7. However, it is made clear the learned Trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T