Budho Kumar Yadav @ Budho Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40572 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2024 Thana- PURAINI District- Madhepura ====================================================== BUDHO KUMAR YADAV @ BUDHO YADAV SON OF NARAYAN YADAV @ JHABRU YADAV RESIDENT OF VILL- RAHTA BHAWANIPUR, WARD NO.- 2, P.S- KUMARKHAND, DISTRICTMADHEPURA. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 05-06-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Puraini P.S. Case no.13 of 2024 registered under sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that while he had gone to attend the marriage ceremony of his relative, unknown accused persons committed theft of cash, jewellery, mobile phone etc in his house.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was registered against unknown. Referring to the order of the learned trial Court, it is submitted that the petitioner was falsely implicated in the case in course of investigation when allegedly a stolen mobile phone was recovered from his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40572 of 2024(2) dt.05-06-2024 2/2 possession. It is submitted that it is the case of the petitioner that he had purchased the same. Inspite of the petitioner being in custody since 5.2.2024, he has not been put on TI parade. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the material that has transpired in course of investigation as is evident from the order of the learned trial Court, the petitioner not having been put on TI parade inspite of being in custody since 5.2.2024, charge-sheet having been submitted in the case and the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Puraini P.S. Case no.13 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udakishunganj, Madhepura.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U