Suryadeep Kumar Giri @ Suryadeep @ Mithun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36624 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2023 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE - DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Suryadeep Kumar Giri @ Suryadeep @ Mithun Kumar S/O Akhilesh Giri R/O Vill.- Raghopur Chaturang, P.s.- Bidupur, Dist.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Patna 2.

Guriya Kumar W/O Suryadeep Kumar Giri @ Suryadeep @ Mithun Kumar, D/O Rajdeo Giri R/O Vill.- Vidyapati Nagar, P.s.- Vidyapati Nagar, Dist.- Samastipur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Suneil Kumar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Lal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for O.P. No. 2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 81 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.

3. It is a case of matrimonial dispute.

4. Vide order dated 10.09.2025, the matter was referred to the Patna High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The report of the learned Mediator shows that the matter could not be resolved between the parties and therefore, the mediation failed.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 3000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36624 of 2025(4) dt.25-11-2025 2/2 no. 2.

6. On the other hand, the learned counsel for O.P. No. 2 has opposed the prayer for bail.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, especially the fact that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 3,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class,Dalsinghsarai, Samastipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 81 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

8. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 3,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2 (the complainant). The interim maintenance will be subject to any other order granted by any other Court of competent jurisdiction granting maintenance to Opposite Party No. 2 (the complainant).

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T