Ramu Nat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39129 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2024 Thana- BAIKUNTHPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Ramu Nat S/o Ganesh Nat Resident of Village - Sirsa Manpur, P.S - Baikunthpur, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anand Vardhan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Nazir Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Baikunthpur P.S. case No. 77 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 15 litres of illicit country made liquor was recovered from the bag which was allegedly thrown by the petitioner when the police came at the place of occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has further been submitted that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39129 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 2/3 It has also been submitted that the procedure prescribed under Sections 103/105 of the B.N.S.S. has not been followed. It has further been submitted that although the petitioner has five criminal antecedents of similar nature of offence but he is on bail in all the cases. It has also been submitted that the charge sheet has been filed in this case and there is no allegation of tampering with the evidence against the petitioner. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 11.04.2026 and he is ready to co-operate in the trial.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that the petitioner has five criminal antecedents of similar nature of offence.

6. Heard the parties and perused the record.

7. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gopalganj, in connection with Baikunthpur P.S. case No. 77 of 2024, with condition(s):- (i) the petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failure on two consecutive

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39129 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 3/3 dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner would be liable to be cancelled.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Praveen Kumar, J) Jyoti/- U T