Patna High CourtL.P.A/1197/2017disposed

Ruby Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-10-17The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1197 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2959 of 2017 ====================================================== Ruby Kumari Wife of Santosh Kumar yadav Resident of Harna, P.S. Dariyapur, District- Saran.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate-cum-District Election Officer (Panchayat), Saran at Chapra, District- Saran at Chapra.

5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sonepur, District- Saran at Chapra.

6. The Senior Deputy Collector, District Legal Cell, Saran at Chapra, District- Saran at Chapra.

7. The Block Devlopment Officer, Dariyapur, District- Saran.

8. The State Election Commission (Panchayat) Bihar through the State Election Commission, Sone Bhawan, 3rd Floor Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

9. Ramawati Devi Wife of Manager Singh Resident of Village- Jalapur, P.O. Bela, P.S. Dariyapur, District- Saran.

10. Gyanti Devi

11. Malti Devi

12. Babita Devi

13. Rita Devi

14. Nasima Khatoon

15. Champa Devi

16. Shail Devi Respondent Nos. 10 to 16 are Member of Block Panchayat Samiti Dariyapur, District- Saran through the Block Devlopment Officer, Dariya Pur (Respondent No. 08) Po Dariyapur, Distt Saran.

17. Madan Kumar , Son of not known the then Sub Divisional Officer, Sonepur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.N.Shahi -Aag6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

Patna High Court LPA No.1197 of 2017 (3) dt.17-10-2017 2/2 17-10-2017 In view of the fact that this appeal is an interlocutory order passed in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2959 of 2017 on 07.03.2017 and the writ petition itself has been disposed of on merit during pendency of the matter, this appeal against the interlocutory order is disposed of. However, the appellant is at liberty to challenge the final order passed in the writ petition, if he has any grievance.

With the aforesaid, the appeal stands disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Shageer/- U