Ashok Prasad v. The Life Insurance Corporation Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2926 of 2015 ====================================================== Ashok Prasad, son of Sri Radha Krishna Prasad, presently residing at Mohalla- Shivaji Nagar, House No.JKS-E-114, Chandpur Bella Road, Police Station- Jakkanpur, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Life Insurance Corporation of India through its Chairman, Yogachhem, Jeevan Bema Marg, Post Box No.19953, Mumbai- 400021.

2. The Zonal Manager, East Central Zone, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Jeevan Deep Building, Exhibition Road, Patna.

3. Senior Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Patna Division-I, Jeevan Prakash Building, Frazer Road, Patna.

4. Senior Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Patna Branch-IV, Jeevan Prakash Building, Frazer Road, Patna.

5. Sri A.M. Sahay, Manager (CLIA)-cum-Investigation Officer, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Patna Division-I, Jeevan Prakash Building, Frazer Road, Patna.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : M/s. Krishna Kant Singh and Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocates For the Respondent LIC : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 20-02-2015 I have heard the parties.

This application has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to the respondent no.2, i.e., the Zonal Manager, East Central Zone, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Patna who happens to be the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner in terms of order dated 02.07.2014. However, at the time of hearing, Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the Life Insurance Corporation has produced an order passed by the respondent no.2

Patna High Court CWJC No.2926 of 2015 (2) dt.20-02-2015 2/2 dated 14th October, 2014 by which the appeal of the petitioner has already been disposed of. Let the aforesaid order be taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the same.

In above view of the matter, this writ application stands disposed of as having become infructuous. However, it would be open for the petitioner to assail the order passed by the appellate authority, if he is not satisfied with the same and if he is well advised for that, before a competent forum which may be available to him under law.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) N.H./- U