Upendra Kumar v. The Chief Secratary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.898 of 2021 ====================================================== Upendra Kumar Son of Sri Suresh Prasad Resident of mohalla- Mogal Kuan, Etwari Bazar, Biharsharif, Nalanda, P.S.- Biharsharif, Pin no. 803101, District- Nalanda (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Chief Secratary State of Bihar, Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna, Pin no. 01.
2.
Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission At Allahabad, 2/500, Bijay Kant Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, through its Secretary/ Director. 3.
Director Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission, Allahabad, 2/500, Bijay Kant Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
4.
That Chairman Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission, Allahabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kaushal Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Lalit Kishore (Ag) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 17-01-2022 The matter is heard via video conferencing due to circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. In the instant petition, petitioner has sought for following reliefs:
"(i) For issuance of a direction to the respondent authority for appointment of the petitioner on the post of clerk which has been qualified by the petitioner in the combined examination conducted in the year 2005.
(ii) For issuance of a direction to the respondent no. 2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner on several dates.
(iii) For grant of any other relief or
Patna High Court CWJC No.898 of 2021 dt.17-01-2022 2/2 reliefs to which the petitioner may be found entitled to under the facts and circumstances of this case."
3. Petitioner has not furnished final select list so as to direct the concerned respondent to consider the petitioner's claim for appointment to the post of Clerk. That apart, petitioner has not impleaded the last selected candidate under the respective category.
4. In the light of these facts and circumstances read with the decision of the Apex Court's rendered in the case of Ranjan Kuamr & Ors Vs. State of Bihar & Ors. reported in (2014) 16 SCC 187 (para 4 to 13), the present petition stands dismissed reserving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh petition in accordance with law.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J) rakhi/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date