Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36482/2019bail granted

Santosh Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2019-06-13Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36482 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2019 Thana- MAKER District- Saran ====================================================== SANTOSH SAHNI, aged about 26 years, male, Son of Sri Shambhu Sahani Resident of Village- Dihi Suraman, Police Station-Maker, District-Saran. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sunil Prasad Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 13-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 31.03.2019 in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 48 of 2019 for the offences alleged under Sections 188, 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 150 litres of country made wine. It is submitted that the recovery has not been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has already suffered about two and half months in custody. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36482 of 2019(2) dt.13-06-2019 2/2 thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned I/C A.D.J. IX Excise, Saran, in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 48 of 2019, on the following conditions- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T