Md. Sarfaraj v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39612 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -205 Year- 2013 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ======================================================

1. Md. Sarfaraj Son of Md. Farukh Resident of Village- Chainpur (Nisarpur), P.O.- Kab, P.S.- Ranitalab, Dist.- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sahida Praveen Daughter of Md. Lukman Gani Resident of VillageMisarichak, P.O.- Nawada, P.S.- Sahar, Dist.- Bhojpur. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.Dayal(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 06-09-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the husband and wife are in some kind of understanding and there is every possibility that they may finally compromise their dispute. In view of the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner, this application is being disposed of with liberty to the party to file joint petition if the parties have entered into any kind of compromise.

The Court below is expected to record compromise irrespective of the offence is compoundable or not in view of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39612 of 2014 (4) dt.06-09-2017 2/2 Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in (2013)4 SCC 58 Jitendra Raghuvanshi Vs. Babita Raghuvanshi.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sanjeev/- U