Golden Ansari @ Gudal Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41176 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2024 Thana- Dehri Mufassil District- Rohtas ====================================================== Golden Ansari @ Gudal Ansari Son of Aftab Alam Village -Bhatauli Ps -Dehri Mufassil District -Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Dehri (M) P.S Case No. 112 of 2024 from the Court of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge, V, Rohtas at Sasaram registered for the offences punishable under Sections 80, 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, it is a case of dowry death of the deceased for the non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is the brother-in-law of the deceased. It is also submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41176 of 2025(3) dt.10-09-2025 2/2 petitioner is in judicial custody since 25.09.2024 and petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the petition.
5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
6. From perusal of the F.I.R., Postmortem Report, impugned order dated 29.04.2025 and case diary, it appears that it is a case of dowry death of the victim within the five years of marriage. It appears that external injury was also found on the body of the deceased. On perusal of FSL report, Aluminium Phosphide commercially known as Celphos was detected in the visceral organ of the deceased.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, materials available on records and submissions made on behalf of learned counsel for the parties, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.
8. Accordingly, prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U T