Anul Huda @ Md. Anul Huda @ Ainul Houda v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37981 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2025 Thana- SHANKARPUR District- Madhepura ====================================================== Anul Huda @ Md. Anul Huda @ Ainul Houda son of Phul Hasan Village -Rampur Lahi, ward no 4, PS -Shankarpur Distt -Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. N.K. Agarwal, Sr. Advocate :
Mr. Dhananjai Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-08-2025 Heard Mr. Dhananjai Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Choubey Jawahar, learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Shankar Pur P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 64, 75, 76, 3(5), 103(1), 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the accused persons including the petitioner committed rape and murder of the victim girl.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37981 of 2025(3) dt.20-08-2025 2/2 omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2025 and has one criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Learned APP further submitted that as per the material available in the case diary, the petitioner was identified by local chowkidaar in alleged video and this petitioner has himself confessed his guilt and, therefore, the petitioner does not deserve to be released on bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also nature and gravity of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T