Satish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.811 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- EASTCHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI) =========================================================== Satish Kumar, S/o Gautam Singh, R/o village-Maldihiya, P.S.-Paharpur, Dist.-East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Superintendent of Police East Champaran at Motihari.
3. Officer Incharge Paharpur Police Station, Dist.-East Champaran.
4. Investigation Officer Paharpur Police Station, District-East Champaran.
5. D.I.G. Champaran Range at Bettiah.
6. I.G. Muzaffapur at Muzaffarpur.
7. D.G.P. Bihar, at Patna.
8. The C.M.O. Motihari at Motihari.
9. The Medical Officer or Incharge Paharpur Primary Health Centre.
10. Dy. S.P. Arearaj Sub Division at Arearaj, Dist.-East Champaran. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar No. 2, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amiya Kunal, AC to AAG-X. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 13-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is one of the accused named in the FIR in Paharpur P.S. Case No. 235 of 2013 dated 4.10.2013 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504 read with 34 of the
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.811 of 2014 dt.13-03-2015 2 / 2 Indian Penal Code.
It has been contended that the petitioner is absolutely innocent in the matter and he is being harassed illegally by the local police.
By filing this application under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India, he has sought for a direction from this Court to the effect that the aforesaid police case be handed over for investigation either to the CBI or C.I.D.
In my view, the application is misconceived. To hold investigation into a cognizable offence is that statutory right of a police. There is nothing exceptional in this case for which the matter is required to be investigated by an agency other than the local police. It is well settled that an accused in a criminal case has no right to choose the investigating agency of his choice. Accordingly, the application, being devoid of any merit, is dismissed.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T