Sanjay Soren @ Sanjay v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48256 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2021 Thana- MANIHARI District- Katihar ====================================================== SANJAY SOREN @ SANJAY Son of Bhim Soren Resident of Village - Singhul, Police Station- Azamnagar, District- Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajendra Prasad Sah, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dashrath Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 25-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366A and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with one unknown person has abducted the sister of the informant on his motorcycle.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48256 of 2021(2) dt.25-04-2022 2/3 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The statement of the victim girl was recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C., in which, she categorically stated that no one has abducted her and she has given her age as 19 years. The Doctor has also assessed her age to be between 17-19 years. It is further submitted that the victim in her statement u/s 164 Cr.P.C. has herself stated she took the petitioner to Delhi and had married him and when she returned her matrimonial home, she came before the police for her statement. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the statement of the victim, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48256 of 2021(2) dt.25-04-2022 3/3 Manihari P.S. Case No.135/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with a further condition that one of the bailors will be the wife of the petitioner i.e. the sister of the informant.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T