Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36994 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2025 Thana- KISHANPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Son of Sukhdev Yadav @ Rajo Radav Resident of Mehasimar, Ward No. 2, P.S.- Kishanpur, Distt.- Supaul, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kumar Prabhakar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-06-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115, 110, 132, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of two cases and the informant, who is a Panchayat Sevak, alleges that petitioner and Md. Akhtar along with other unknown accused came and abused the informant and assaulted him by fists and slaps and even snatched government documents and created hindrance in discharge of official duty.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36994 of 2026(2) dt.15-06-2026 2/3
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant being husband of the Mukhiya. It is submitted that wife of the petitioner had instituted a complaint against the informant, as such, the instant false case came to be instituted with a view to coerce the wife of the petitioner into submission. It is also submitted that if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Kishanpur P. S. Case No. 241 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36994 of 2026(2) dt.15-06-2026 3/3 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
7. The application stands allowed.
8. However, it is made clear that in the event, if any application is filed by the Investigating Officer before the learned trial Court bringing to its notice that petitioner, despite giving assurance to this Court, is not cooperating in the investigation or is not presenting himself as and when required, the learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after recording reasons.
9. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned Police Station through the learned trial Court. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T