← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7638/2016disposed

Naresh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-11-09Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah,Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7638 of 2016 =========================================================== Naresh Prasad, son of late Ram Rakshya Prasad Yadav, resident of VillageMohra, P.S. Atari, District Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Home Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna Old Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Special Home Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

4. The Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

6. The District Magistrate, Gaya.

7. The Senior Superintendent of police, Gaya.

8. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Khijarsarai, District-Gaya.

9. The S.H.O. P.S. Atari, District Gaya.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Srivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, A.C. to A.A.G.-6 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 09-11-2016 The petitioner has sought entrustment of investigation of Atari P. S. Case No.46 of 2016 to C.I.D. or C.B.I. Earlier also; the petitioner had filed Cr. W. J. C. No.1050 of 2007 claming arrest of the accused persons and for establishment of permanent police station at Mohara Block and for payment of compensation. The said writ petition was disposed of on 17th September, 2008. Later, a contempt petition bearing MJC No.2290 of

Patna High Court CWJC No.7638 of 2016 dt.09-11-2016 2/2 2009 was filed which was decided on 16th December, 2009. The petitioner has now again invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court said to be under public interest, but the relief claimed is either for payment of compensation or transfer of a sum or for entrustment of investigation to C.I.D or C.B.I.

In view of the orders earlier passed, we do not find that the petitioner can be granted any other relief other than what has been granted earlier. No further order is called for in the present petition. The same stands disposed of.

(Hemant Gupta, ACJ) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Sunil/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N. A.

Uploading Date 11.11.2016 Transmission Date