← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3452/2009dfd for non appearance

Rameshwar Nath Mishra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-08-01Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3452 of 2009 ====================================================== Rameshwar Nath Mishra son of Late Radha Prasad Mishra, resident of Village Durgadih, Police Station Bikramganj, District Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram

3. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Bikramganj, District Rohtas

4. The Circle Officer, Bikramganj, District Rohtas

5. Most. Jamwanti Kuar wife of Late Ramesh Upadhya, resident of Village Rakashian, Post Office Jharkhoria, Police Station Agarer, District Rohtas

6. Sakuntala Devi wife of Shambhu Nath Debey, resident of Village Dubey-Dehri, Post Office Natwar Khurd, Police Station Natwar, District Rohtas

7. Mansa Devi wife of Binod Pandey, resident of Village Belwaiyan, Post Officer and Police Station Dinara, District Rohtas

8. Meena Devi wife of Satyendra Pandey @ Shushil Kumar Pandey, Advocate, resident of Road No.1, Postal Park, Post Office Postal Park, District Patna

9. Reena Devi wife of Sriman Narayan Patha, resident of Village Jagmanpur, Post Office Etadhian, Police Station Dhansoin, District Buxar

10. Seema Devi wife of Santosh Pandey (son of Chandradeo Pandey) resident of Hanuman Nagar, Post Office Patrakar Nagar, Kankarbag, District Patna Respondent Nos. 5 to 10 are daughters of Late Dudheshwar Nath Mishra, Opposite Party in Court below .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: Mr.A. Ujjawal, SC 4 Mr.Upendra Pratap Singh, AC to SC 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-08-2016 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioner in support of the present writ petition, though the names of the learned counsel appearing on his behalf are printed in the daily cause list.

Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Tahir/- U