Ramayan Prasad @ Ramayan Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39056 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1247 Year-2025 Thana- KANKARBAG District- Patna ====================================================== Ramayan Prasad @ Ramayan Sah Son of Late Dhuri Prasad @ Hari Lal Sah Resident of Mohalla- Ramlakhan Path, P.S.- Kankarbagh, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bhavesh Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 1247 of 2025 dated 30.12.2025, registered for the offence punishable under Section/s 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 117, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 29.12.2025, the accused persons wrongfully restrained the informant, assaulted him and his companions with iron rods and a sharp weapon, causing injuries including head injury and a fractured wrist, and also snatched the informant's gold chain.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case and the dispute arose in this case because of non-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39056 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 2/3 payment of wages for the work done. It is next submitted that there is nothing specific against the petitioner and the petitioner is a person of clean antecedent. It is further submitted that the co-accused namely Kanhaiya Kumar @ Aryan Raj has already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.04.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 19385 of 2026.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there is nothing specific against the petitioner, the co-accused has already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and, as also, the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (XI) cum CJ (SD) XI, Patna in connection with Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 1247 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39056 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 3/3 well as the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U T