Ashok Chandra Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18429 of 2018 ====================================================== Ashok Chandra Choudhary son of Late Satyadeo Choudhary, resident of Mohalla- Bengalitola, Laheriasarai, P.S. Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Sugarcane Industries Deptt. Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.
The Principal Secretary, Sugarcane Industries Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Cane Commissioner Bihar, Sugarcane Industries Department, Govt of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Bihar State Sugar Corporation Limited through its Managing Director, 2nd Floor, Udyog Bhawan, N 5.
The Managing Director, Ryam Sugar Factory Ltd., Darbhanga. 6.
The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.
7.
The District Magistrate, Madhubani.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Chandan Jha, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Suresh Kumar Mr. Arun Kumar, AC to GP1 for the Sugarcane Corp. :
Mr. Gyan Prakash, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 31-07-2025
1. During the course of arguments, the Learned counsel for the respondents brought to the notice of this Court that the order dated 03.02.2020 passed by the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in FMA 426 of 2020 (FMAT 1759 of 1993) with CAN 899 of 2008 and CAN 1008 of 2008, titled The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Bihar State Sugar Corporation
Patna High Court CWJC No.18429 of 2018(4) dt.31-07-2025 2/2 Limited vs. Netaji Industrial Works and Others, wherein it is noted that the petitioner has purchased the property from Netaji Industrial Works.
2. After going through the said said order copy, the Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he intends to withdraw the Writ petition with liberty to avail his remedy before the appropriate forum.
3. Liberty is granted to pursue the remedy.
4. Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) amandeep/- U