Raja Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41638 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1019 Year-2021 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria ====================================================== RAJA YADAV Son of Late Tara Kant Yadav Resident of Bhojua, Ward No.- 7, P.S.- Gogari, District - Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rama Kant Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 147 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a young boy aged about 20 years and the informant alleges that petitioner along with co-accused persons collected huge amount of money on behalf of Bajaj Finance Company and gave forged receiving and thus misappropriated the money to the tune of Rs. 3.24 Crores of nearly 179 customers.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41638 of 2022(2) dt.12-12-2022 2/3 next submitted that the purpose of arrest is not to punish but to ensure that the investigation is not hampered, it is thus submitted that petitioner assures that he will cooperate in the investigation and will present himself as and when required by the Investigating Officer of the case for arriving at the truth. It is also submitted that petitioner was not involved in the occurrence and he came to be implicated merely because he was known to Abhinav Pandey.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Khagaria P.S. Case No. 1019 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his mother Renu Devi.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41638 of 2022(2) dt.12-12-2022 3/3 Further, in the event, if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the learned Trial Court bringing to its notice that the petitioner despite giving an undertaking before this Court that he will cooperate in the investigation and will present himself as and when required by the I.O, is not cooperating in the investigation and is not appearing when called for, the learned Trial Court after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner shall pass orders in accordance with law and shall also have liberty to cancel his bail bonds. Learned Trial Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to the concerned P.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T