Mishari Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.437 of 2017 ====================================================== Mishari Rai, Son of Late Pargan Rai, Resident of Village- Ahirauliya Tola Rajepur, P.S.- Kotwa, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Additional Collector Motihari, District East Champaran.

3. L.R.D.C. Sadar Motihari, District East Champaran.

4. Manish Kumar, Son of Late Surendra Pd Singh, Resident of VillageAhiraulia, P.S.- Kotwa, District- East Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shakti Suman Kumar Mr Rajesh Ranjan No.1 For the Respondent/s :

Mr. AC to AAG 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) 19-02-2018 There is a delay of 1 year, 3 months and 08 days in preferring the review application where limitation is of 30 days. The narration of grounds or reasons for not preferring review within time does not satisfy us. Therefore, I.A. No.7840 of 2017 is rejected.

We have also perused the impugned order dated 23.06.2016 against which the review application has been preferred. Since nothing is pointed out which can show on the face of record that an error has been committed by the Division Bench in deciding the LPAs, no case for review is made out.

Patna High Court C. REV. No.437 of 2017(3) dt.19-02-2018 2/2 Therefore, the limitation petition as well as the review application stand dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) ( Nilu Agrawal, J) sk U