Prakash Mahton @ Prakash Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1085 of 2021 ====================================================== Prakash Mahton @ Prakash Mahto Son of Late Ganauri Mahto, resident of Saroj Sadan, Road no. 5A, House no. 17, P.O. - Keshri Nagar, Police StationPatliputra, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Bihar. 3.

The Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

5.

Block Development Officer, Bihta (Patna).

6.

The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

7.

The Administrator, Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board (Repealed), Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Pathak, AC to GP 21 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-12-2022 In compliance of the order of this Court dated 21.11.2022 a supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no 5.

Mr. Ashok Kumar Pathak, learned AC to GP 21, by referring to the statements made in the supplementary counter affidavit submits that the remaining outstanding dues amount of the petitioner have stood paid to the petitioner and in this regard specific submission has been made in paragraph nos. 9 and 11, thereof. He further submits that the service book of the petitioner

Patna High Court CWJC No.1085 of 2021 dt.06-12-2022 2/2 along with necessary papers have already been sent to the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna, for payment of arrears of gratuity and the same will be processed on receipt of the payment order from Accountant General.

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the counsel for the State, the present application stands disposed of as the grievance of the petitioner has redressed. It is needless to say that if the petitioner has still any grievance remains, he would be at liberty to move before the appropriate authority for redressal of his grievance and if in case the petitioner will file such a representation, the same would be disposed of expeditiously.

(Harish Kumar, J) shivank/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 07.12.2022.

Transmission Date NA