Kiran Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2992 of 2015 ===========================================================
1. Kiran Devi W/o Rajesh Mandal resident of Village - Pakri, P.S. - Palasi, District - Araria.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Divisional Commissioner, Purnea Division, Purnea.
3. The Director, Integrated Child Development Services, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4. The District Magistrate, Araria.
5. The District Welfare Officer, Araria.
6. The District Programme Officer, Araria.
7. The Block Development Officer, Palasi, Araria.
8. The Child Development Project Officer, Palasi, Araria.
9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Pakri, Block - Palasi, District - Araria.
10. Menika Kumari Wife of Shashi Kumar Mandal resident of Village - Pakri, P.S. - Palasi, District - Araria, presently working as Anganbari Sevika of Pakri South Anganbari Centre No. 125 in the Palasi Block, District - Araria. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prashant Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC6- Manindra Kishore Singh =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-02-2015 Many a things have happened since passing of the order dated 9.11.2011 by the Divisional Commissioner, Purnea, including the fact that new selection and appointment has been made. In absence of any clear and cogent reason to unsettle a settled position after four years, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ application of the petitioner at such belated stage when no cogent and valid reason of delay in approaching the Court is coming forth. The
Patna High Court CWJC No.2992 of 2015 dt.23-02-2015 2/2 writ application relates to removal of the petitioner from the post of Aanganbari Sevika, which has been held by the Divisional Commissioner to be correct as well.
In view of the same, writ is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U