Dharmendra Kumar Singh @ Sandeep Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39954 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-695 Year-2021 Thana- BARHARA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINGH @ SANDEEP SINGH Son of Binod Singh @ Binod Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Mohanpur Karja, P.s.- Barhara, Distt.- Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner along with co-accused persons assaulted his son with lathi, danda and an iron rod and also assaulted Raj Kishore and Jitendra, further Dharmendra was armed with pistol and Rajnish snatched gold chain of his son.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39954 of 2022 (2) dt.08-12-2022 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature, it is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting for the purposes of anticipatory bail, then the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature which amply demonstrates that accused persons never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence, it is next submitted that on intervention of well-wishers the parties have compromised, as would be evident from Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39954 of 2022 (2) dt.08-12-2022 3/3 case is pending/successor court in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No. 695 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T