Nunu Babu Singh @ Lukhar Pahalwan @ Lukhar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40710 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2022 Thana- TETERHAT District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Nunu Babu Singh @ Lukhar Pahalwan @ Lukhar Singh Son of Late Nand Kishor Singh @ Nand Keswar Singh Resident of village - Sharma, P.S.- Tetarhat, District - Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Tetarhat P.S. Case No. 88 of 2022 for the offence registered under Sections 385 and 387/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of five cases' out of which, the petitioner has been acquitted in three cases. It is next submitted that the informant alleges that he intended to set up a factory in the village and in this connection he had gone to meet Sunil Singh and when he was coming back, he was intercepted by the accused persons including the petitioner, Pintu Singh along with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40710 of 2024(3) dt.02-09-2024 2/3 Chintu Singh at the point of gun demanded a ransom of Rs. 10,00,000/-. It is further submitted that Pintu Singh had moved this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 36709 of 2024 and the same was allowed by an order dated 26.06.2024. It is next submitted that the petitioner being father of Pintu Singh and Chintu Singh came to be implicated in the instant case because of his antecedent. It is also submitted that the petitioner will not abscond rather he will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.
4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for bail.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, let the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Tetarhat P.S. Case No. 88 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
6. However, in the event, if the Investigating Officer files an application before the learned Trial Court bringing on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40710 of 2024(3) dt.02-09-2024 3/3 notice that the petitioner despite assurance to this Court is not cooperating in the investigation, in that event, the learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Jagdish/- U T