Sahil @ Md. Sahil v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44151 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2023 Thana- KORHA District- Katihar ====================================================== SAHIL @ MD. SAHIL Son of Md. Manjoor Resident of village - Pawai, P.S. - Korha, Distt. - Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajendra Prasad Sah For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 21-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 393, 171, 419, 420, 467, 468, 386, 387 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of extorting money from the vehicle driver by having police logo marked on the Car (Tiago Car, Registration No. BR10AG-7697). It is further alleged that the police party reached there and apprehended four persons including petitioner and one mobile phone has recovered from the possession of petitioner and other articles from co-accused.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44151 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 2/2 committed no offence. The as alleged recovery of one mobile phone is belongs to petitioner itself. Petitioner has no concern with the seized vehicle, from which the money extorted. Nothing incriminating articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Due to his criminal antecedents, the police has been falsely implicated in the present case. He is languishing in judicial custody since 06.01.2023.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Korha P.S. Case No. 11 of 2023.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T