Md. Imran Khan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2197 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16076 of 2010 ====================================================== Md. Imran Khan S/O Md. Ahsan Khan R/O vill.- Reghunathpur, P.O.- Piroo, P.S.- Haspura, Distt. - Aurangabad Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Mr. Deepak Kumar, The Chief Secretary Government of Bihar.

2.

Smt. Sanueeva Roy, The Deputy Inspector General Of Police, Group Centre, C.R.P.F., Muzaffarpur, Bihar.

3.

Shri D.K, Tripathi, The Deputy Inspector General Of Police Group Centre, C.R.P.F., Mokama Ghat, Bihar, Distt.- Patna.

4.

Shri Niyaj Ahnas, The Deputy Commandant Administration Group Centre, C.R.P.F., Mokama Ghat, Bihar, Distt.- Patna.

5.

Shri Rajesh Vatsa, The commandant Staff C/O D.I.G.P., C.R.P.F., Rampur, Group Centre, C.R.P.F., Mokama Ghat.

6.

Shri Shukhpal Singh, The Commandant For Inspector General Bihar Sector, C.R.P.F., Patna.

7.

Shri Ajit Kumar Diwakar, The Senior Medical Officer The Commandant Rectt. Board At Group Centre, Muzaffarpur, Bihar. 8.

Shri Sanueeva Roy, The D.I.G.P. Group Centre, C.R.P.F., Muzaffarpur, Mokama Ghat, Bihar 9.

Dr. Ajeet Kumar Diwakar, The Competent Authority Composite Hospital C.R.P.F., Muzaffarpur, Bihar.

10.

Prof. Dr. Ashok Kumar, M.D., Fiacm, P.M.C.H., Patna. 11.

The Union Of India Through Shri Sunand Kumar, Senior Commandant, C.R.P.F., New Delhi.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rohit Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. S.D. Sanjay (Adsg) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 05-05-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

Patna High Court MJC No.2197 of 2019(9) dt.05-05-2026 2/2 "for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 20.02.2019 passed in CWJC No. 16076 of 2010."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.

4. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U