Sahrukh @ Sahrukh Khan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37494 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2025 Thana- Kalibagh District- West Champaran ====================================================== Sahrukh @ Sahrukh Khan Son of Hazrat Alam Resident of VillageDawardevi Chowk, P.S.- Kalibagh, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1) 109, 74, 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that petitioner along with Nanhe entered his house and started abusing, on objection assaulted by knife causing injury on cheek, further petitioner poured petrol on his house and had acted inappropriately with his sister.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that specific allegation of assaulting the informant by knife causing injury on cheek of the informant is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37494 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026 2/2 against Nanhe. It is further submitted that petitioner has been implicated with general and omnibus allegation that he poured petrol on the house but then the house was not burnt nor the FIR discloses that what inappropriate act the petitioner indulged in with the sister of the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that injury suffered by the informant has been opined to be simple caused by hard and blunt substance thus allegation of assault by knife gets belied.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kalibagh P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482

(2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T