Ranjan Sharma @ Pahalwanji @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41320 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-144 Year-2022 Thana- MAIN P.S. District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

RANJAN SHARMA @ PAHALWANJI @ RANJAN KUMAR Son of Ram Tawakya Sharma Resident of Village - Salempur, P.S.- Alipur, District - Gaya.

2.

Shayama Kumar @ Shyam Kumar @ Pahalwan Son of Siyaram Sharma Resident of Village - Salempur, P.S.- Alipur, District - Gaya. 3.

Bablu Sharma @ Bablu Kumar Son of Girjesh Sharma Resident of Village - Nima Bigha, P.S.- Main, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-08-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Main P.S. Case No. 144 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have antecedent of four cases and the informant alleges that driver of the tractor fled while the trailer along with sand was seized and the name of the petitioners was disclosed by the villagers.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41320 of 2023(2) dt.07-08-2023 2/2 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the seized trailer do not belong to the petitioners who are associates of contractors of sand and thus they have been falsely implicated in the present case at the instance of the villagers but then the FIR does not disclose the name of the villagers, it is also asserted and submitted that the seized trailer does not belong to the petitioners.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Main P.S. Case No. 144 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T